Showing posts with label SOVA Assignments. Show all posts
Showing posts with label SOVA Assignments. Show all posts

Tuesday, 1 May 2012

AEP Assignment Evaluation

Title of Artwork: Big Bad Thing (that was the title of our AEP assignment)
Medium: Clay, ceramic paint and glaze
Date: about September 2010
Big Bad Thing
Side view of Big Bad Thing
Back view of Big Bad Thing
The Big Bad Thing's side view

We were tasked in Sec 2 to create a Big Bad Thing, our own version of a child's nightmare monster.

This assignment was important to me as it was only the 2nd or 3rd time we were working with clay - and this was the most major assignment I had ever undertaken with clay.

I drew inspiration from Pooh's Hunny Pots. Too much honey can be a nightmare when it makes your throat feel like it's on fire and your eyes water. Big Bad Thing is essentially a misshapen pot of honey. It may not quite live up to its name but perchance tonight it will make its first appearance in your sleep... You will realise how absolutely gargantuan it is in the dream world.

I first did preparatory sketches which our teacher looked through; she then gave feedback. I first faced the difficulty of being too uncreative in my idea. I was prompted to think of ways by which my idea could be infused with more creativity. I was actually quite discouraged because of this initial difficulty. I then added the cutlery "dripping" down the sides of the honey pot. This was also to hint that the honey oozing out of the pot was actually honey and not hair, which some of my friends thought it looked like because of my sketching style (I use lines to make a dark area darker).

Big Bad Thing was a hollow structure of 2 pieces of clay brought together. I first made the
lid and the pot. The Thing's face was literally the pot. I created the large round eyes by rolling up 2 pieces of clay into almost equally sized balls and then flattening them with a flat panel of wood. However I couldn't flatten them well enough. Later on when attempting to stick them onto the Thing's body as eyes, they went out of shape.

For the lid I created a mesh of texture by using one of the potter's tools to create a mish-mash of grooves in the surface of the lid. Then after conjoining the lid and the pot together, I added the oozing honey by the sides of the lid. Next came the fork and the spoon and the knife, where I tried to achieve a look where the cutlery was flowing / growing out of the honey. The cutlery is surrealistic because they are bent at unnatural angles, and remind me of the melting clocks in Salvador Dali's work. The Thing is also meant to belong to a dream-like world, so it has traces of surrealism in it. Unfortunately we did not take any pictures of the process, so I only have pictures of the end product. ):

We sent the Things to the kiln. Afterwards I painted with ceramic paint onto the honey pot. It was then that I realised I had not finalised the colours of the decorative circles which I had planned to be painted on the Thing's body. However this problem was quickly overcome after I looked at the various colours available (and after some thinking). To my dismay(somewhat), the colours dulled after the paint dried. This made it so that what I originally saw was not what I got.

After the paint dried I applied a moderate layer of glaze over the Thing and placed it in the kiln.

When the sculptures were taken out, I realised that the glaze had flowed toward the bottom of my sculpture. Hence the glaze was no longer as even as it had been. (These were some of the difficulties and unforeseen results which I faced.)

I think that I should have been more meticulous in planning, such as the specific colours to be used for which areas. I should also have been more careful in handling the clay when it was still soft. I think that I managed to apply what I had learnt in SoVA lessons such as the use of texture, and juxtaposing warm and cool colours together. The volume of the sculpture is also satisfactory to me. For the eyes, which got out of shape when I tried to stick them onto the body of the sculpture, I should have rolled a piece of clay through the slab roller and then used a cylindrical object to cut out two eyes. I also could have used a flat object like a wooden panel to press the eyes onto the body.

I feel that I have learnt more about being creative through trial and error in this assignment. I will try to put in more creativity into my coursework sketches.

Saturday, 31 March 2012

Christo SOVA Assignment PART 1

Christo and Jeanne-Claude
Christo and Jeanne-Claude are husband and wife environmentalist-artists who are dedicated to their artistic cause. Together they have done numerous art projects, the most large-scale one being Wrapped Coast, 1968-1969.
Wrapped Coast, by Christo and Jeanne-Claude (1968-1969)

That brings us to the topic of this SoVA assignment. Here are my answers to the questions for the assignment.

1) Christo and Jean-Claude’s work is highly unique. How would you describe this artwork to one of your peers? Use art specific vocabulary, as well as adjectives to answer.

This work is unique in the sense of its scale and the idea behind it. To wrap a whole coast is a brave and bold thing to do, a tedious process which involves a lot of manpower and effort. The artwork is a special attempt at making an environmental statement about preservation of the environment.

Christo and Jeanne-Claude have used white fabric to wrap the coast in Little Bay, Sydney, Australia. The collage of the many pieces of fabric, secured over each other, show influence from Cubism, in which art movement the collage was said to have been first invented. The artwork does not require any ink or paint or canvas; the coast is the canvas, the cloth provides colour to the canvas - only better.

The undulating form of the work results from the changing effects of light and natural forces on the white fabric as opposed to the staticity of a two-dimensional artwork like a painting. As the wind ripples through the cloth, a sense of fluidity is prevalent in the work. This fluidity is molded by nature, by the wind, with the shape and form of the coast accentuated by the light of the sun and moon and different times of the day. As the hours go by, shadows form in different crevices, bringing out different perspectives to the artwork. The artists have masterfully let nature be the medium through which they express their artwork.

Their use of cloth to wrap the coast emphasises a lot on preservation. When we wrap something, we want to protect it, to keep it. They are showing us that nature should be preserved and carefully kept, through the symbolic temporary wrapping of the coast.

The artists used linear perspective to bring out the incomprehensible scale of the artwork. As it is three-dimensional, linear perspective is inherent in the natural artwork. Based on where we view the artwork from, the shape and form of the artwork changes with linear perspective. As we view the work all around, watching its shape and form change, we can understand more about the complexity of nature. The coast, if viewed from a certain angle, because of linear perspective, also seems to be stretching on and on. This effectively gives the viewer a sense of being overwhelmed by nature.

The white fabric used was also a good colour. It stylised the artwork by eliminating unnecessary details such as craggy rocks and moss, emphasising the principle of simplifying art forms - by the suggested shape and form we can tell what it is. White also captures light effectively as it is a good reflector of light. Hence the artwork is sensitive to even subtle changes in light. This infuses the artwork with monochromatic colours - the shadows form darker tones, then there are mid-tones and the brightest tones where light shines directly on them.

The usage of white fabric in the artwork also employs the principle of arbitrary colour, famous with the Fauvists. As monochromatic white is not the natural colour of the cliff, which is usually made up of dark brown rocks and, sometimes, green moss, hence the artwork can be classified as one made up of arbitrary colours.

Bibemus Quarry, Paul Cezanne
The squarish geometric natural shapes which make out the outline of the coast are similar to the kind the Cubist Paul Cezanne used in some of his naturalistic landscape paintings. (See Bibemus Quarry) Overlapping geometric shapes, emphasised by the white fabric and the monochromatic colours, also bear resemblance to Analytical Cubist work. The natural shape of the coast forms vague triangular and rectangular shapes, which are accentuated by light and shadows, and also the minimalist use of plain white fabric. 

2) In your own words, what is the subject matter of the “Wrapped Coast”? What was the purpose of creating such a monumental work?

The subject matter of Wrapped Coast was the natural beauty of the coast. The white fabric which covered the details of the coast brought out its shape, allowing us to see past the usual craggy rocks and moss, into the beauty of the gargantuan coast as the light of the sun highlighted the different aspects of its beauty on the plain white cloth, details that we would otherwise not have seen as clearly due to the dark colour of the rocks.

Their allowance of nature to shape their artwork is all the more a powerful environmental statement - that nature is beauty, that we should preserve nature. Such a monumental artwork would leave a sure imprint upon the mind of the public that this part of nature was wrapped in 1968 to 1969, that we should all continue the painstaking efforts and legacy of the artists involved to preserve the environment.